This post was authored by Adem Tumerkan, Dunham's Content Editor. If you have questions concerning today's topic, please call us at (858) 964 - 0500. Hold us to higher standards.

AI’s Power Problem: Why Big Tech’s Data Centers Are Pushing Your Electricity Bill Higher

• Big Tech’s AI buildout is driving up electricity prices in states with heavy data-center growth — raising consumer utility bills even before these data centers are operational.
  
  
• Because of the way grid costs are allocated, consumers — not tech companies — are financing the massive energy and infrastructure upgrades required for AI’s soaring power demand.

What you need to know: AI’s runaway data-center boom has turned electricity into the new bottleneck with power prices surging in various states already as consumers foot the multibillion-dollar bill for the energy these facilities haven’t even built yet¹. 

Why it matters: For the first time in decades, U.S. electricity demand is rising faster because of AI infrastructure that may never fully materialize. Grid operators must commit to massive upgrades years before data centers go live, so utilities lock in tens of billions of dollars in future power purchases based on forecasts that might never come true. If these projects scale back or disappear, consumers end up holding the “stranded cost” bag - aka higher monthly bills and overbuilt infrastructure funded by everyday Americans. 

Now the Deep Dive: One of the biggest unintended consequences of the AI buildout is the strain it’s putting on the U.S. power grid - and the quiet fact that consumers are being drafted to pay for it.

The numbers already show this happening.

In the five states with the fastest data-center growth - Virginia, Texas, California, Illinois, and Ohio - industrial electricity prices have jumped +43% in five years, compared with +26% nationally.

• That’s roughly 4% a year vs. 4.7% - a widening gap that starts almost exactly after ChatGPT’s late-2022 release, when AI demand slammed into utilities like a bus.

Driving these price pressures is PJM Interconnection - the country’s largest grid operator and home to the world’s biggest data-center hub in Northern Virginia.

PJM expects 30 gigawatts of additional AI-driven demand by 2030 – about the annual electricity use of 24 million homes.

And to prepare for that future power load, consumers will pay around an extra $17 billion from 2025–2027, with nearly 90% tied directly to data-center demand.

Put simply, this setup acts like a massive wealth transfer from ratepayers to Big Tech

• They build their data centers that soak up energy while the power companies charge us now (before these data centers are even operating).

Why? Because even though many of these data centers haven’t even come online, power firms must start building out substations, transmission lines, and long-term power contracts now - and those costs flow straight into household bills

Worse, a lot of the expected demand may be grossly inflated.

Developers often file multiple requests across multiple states just to keep options open (aka rather be safe and sorry).

For example, when AEP Ohio required data-center operators to actually commit money upfront - by paying for 85% of the load they claimed to need - projected demand collapsed from 30 gigawatts to ~13².

That’s how much speculation had been baked in.

And no - this time, overbuilding won’t push prices down.

That’s because U.S. utilities operate on a cost-recovery model – meaning once they build infrastructure, consumers pay for it whether the power gets used or not.

• Said another way, extra capacity doesn’t lead to cheaper electricity - it just becomes a stranded asset that households finance over decades.

And this surge in utility demand is only beginning. . .

National data-center plans have exploded to 80 gigawatts - more than double last year and 8x the level of 2022. And while most of it is still just proposed construction, it’s already shaping big, expensive decisions for the grid.

Thus, AI’s next bottleneck might not be GPUs and chips - but raw power.

In the end, power is the one thing AI can’t outcompute. And someone always pays the bill. 

Figure 1: DoubleLine, November 2025

China’s Housing Data Blackout: Why Beijing’s Vanishing Numbers Are the Real Red Flag

• China’s order to halt home-sales data is the clearest signal yet that the real estate downturn is far worse than officials want anyone to see.
  
  
• As Beijing scrubs more economic indicators from public view, investors are left flying blind — and markets can’t price risk when the data goes dark.

What you need to know: Beijing told private agencies to stop publishing home-sales data — another red flag in a disturbing trend where China’s weakest economic indicators aren’t revised, they simply vanish, and leave us flying blind as the housing downturn deepens³. 

Why it matters: China’s housing bubble is still unwinding, and like every major real estate bust, it threatens to drag the broader economy with it. But with Beijing now pulling key housing data from public view, banks, developers, and homebuyers can’t even quantify the risks. When visibility disappears, uncertainty rises – and if there’s one thing markets hate, it’s uncertainty. 

Now the Deep Dive: China’s latest move to halt home-sales data isn’t a one-off thing - it’s a symptom of a much deeper problem of when the numbers get ugly, Beijing turns off the lights.

This latest blackout involves two of China’s major private housing data providers - China Real Estate Information Corp. and China Index Academy - which normally publish early monthly sales for the country’s top 100 developers. Both were told to suspend public releases just as November’s figures were expected to show yet another sharp decline.

Meanwhile, China Vanke Co. - long considered among China’s “healthier” developers - suddenly asked to delay a bond repayment (for a year!)⁴. That move alone told the market what the missing data likely would have confirmed - the housing slump isn’t finding a floor. It’s still free-falling.

And in a property market that once made up as much as 30% of China’s GDP, early indicators truly matter.

Why? Because:

• Developers need them to plan projects and avoid insolvency.
• Commodity producers depend on them to gauge demand for steel, cement, copper, etc.
• Banks use them to price credit risk across the financial system.
• Households rely on them before making the biggest purchase of their lives.
• Investors need them to quantify exposure before deploying money.

Pull those numbers, and you’re not just hiding weakness — you’re blinding the very people who need to see it.

But again, this isn’t about one dataset. It’s about the slow disappearance of an entire dashboard.

Over the past two years, Beijing has taken hundreds of economic indicators offline – such as land sale revenues, youth-unemployment figures, foreign-investment data, business-confidence surveys, and even cremation statistics in some cities.

Every missing number signals the same thing - anything that doesn’t fit the official narrative is simply purged.

• I wrote about China’s “curious case of vanishing data” back in May.

And this is where Beijing turns a bad situation into a worse one. They took data that looked ugly and decided the best solution was to hide it, not fix it.

Markets run on trust and confidence. They can handle ugly truths. They can price defaults, falling sales, and painful resets. They’ve done it before - as long as the data is real. But what they can’t price - and what they fear most - is simply not knowing.

Every missing statistic widens the gap between what’s happening on the ground and what’s being officially reported. It leaves investors guessing, banks hesitating, and policymakers navigating without instruments.

Put simply, a bursting housing bubble is dangerous. But a bursting bubble you can’t even somewhat measure? That’s fatal.

Figure 2: Bloomberg, December 2025

Japan Unleashes $135B Stimulus — And the Yen, Bond Markets, and Carry Trade May All Pay the Price

• Japan’s $135B stimulus could accelerate inflation, force the BOJ toward rate hikes, and spark a sharp yen snapback that threatens the global carry trade.
  
  
• With new bond issuance pushing long-term yields to 17-year highs, Japan’s stimulus risks unsettling global liquidity as the world’s biggest supplier of cheap capital suddenly looks unstable.

What you need to know: Japan announced a $135B stimulus — its biggest since the pandemic — a move that could stoke inflation, shake the yen, disrupt the global carry trade, and test the limits of the world’s most indebted major economy⁵. 

Why it matters: Japan isn’t the sleepy, deflation-era story it once was. Inflation has run above the BOJ’s (Bank of Japan) target for nearly four straight years, long-term yields are at their highest since 2008, and the yen has been wobbling under the pressure of rising import costs. A stimulus this large - funded partly through new debt issuance - risks pushing Japan closer to policy tightening, destabilizing the yen carry trade, and creating spillovers for global liquidity. 

Now the Deep Dive: Japan’s new $135B stimulus package is classic Tokyo economics - big, bold, and arguably too late.

Things like cash handouts, tax cuts, and energy subsidies hope to revive consumption after GDP shrank 1.8% on an annualized basis in September. And for households facing 3% inflation and rising living costs, this looks like welcome relief.

But beware.

Stimulus in a supply-push inflation environment -  where prices rise because supply shocks drive costs higher - works like lighter fluid on a fire you don’t control.

• For example, Japan’s rice harvest has seen some of its weakest in years, driving rice prices sharply higher - not because demand is booming, but because supply fell.

After 43 straight months above the BOJ’s 2% target, handing consumers more cash risks fueling the very inflation Japan is trying to fight. Higher incomes chasing higher import costs (esp. for food and energy) is not demand-led prosperity - it’s just the weak yen showing up on grocery bills.

And this is where the BOJ’s noose tightens. . .

The more Tokyo pumps to try and appease consumers, the harder it becomes for the BOJ to not hike rates – thus potentially popping what many consider the world’s largest bond bubble after decades of yield suppression.

The yen has already lost roughly 40% of its value versus the dollar since 2020. But here’s the overlooked part - the yen is now far weaker than Japan’s fundamentals justify. Even Japan’s own finance minister says fair value is closer to 120–130, not the 155 region. Whenever assets disconnect from fundamentals, they tend to snap back violently.

If this stimulus pushes inflation higher and forces the BOJ to tighten sooner, the yen could snap back sharply -  hammering exporters, killing the carry trade, and sending shockwaves across global markets. History offers a warning: the yen once jumped 14% in a single day in 1998 as carry trades unwound.

But if the yen weakens even further, Japan’s imported inflation problem worsens.
Consumers get squeezed. Living standards fall. And the stimulus designed to help households becomes self-defeating.

Japan is stuck between two bad choices:

• A strong yen hurts exporters - the backbone of Japan’s economy.
• A weak yen hurts consumers – who have already struggled after 25 years of stagnant wages.

Unwinding that imbalance won’t be easy or fast.

Now layer in the debt math.

Japan already carries the highest debt load in the developed world, and this package requires 11.7 trillion yen in new bonds. But with long-term JGB yields already hitting their highest level since 2008 - too much new issuance would likely push them even higher.

And that’s where the global ripple begins.

Japan is still one of the world’s last major suppliers of cheap capital. When Tokyo spends big, yields move, the yen dances, and global liquidity reacts - from U.S. Treasuries and emerging markets to every leveraged trade built on ultra-cheap yen funding. Even a whiff of BOJ normalization can tighten financial conditions worldwide.

So yes, Japan’s new stimulus may help in the short run (especially with asset prices and global demand).

But it raises the stakes for inflation, the yen, the bond market, and global liquidity later.

Put simply, in trying to ease pressure today, Tokyo may have just created a new set of pressures for tomorrow.

For decades, Japan wanted a spark.  Now, it may have lit a fuse.

Figure 3: Bloomberg, December 2025

Anyway, who knows how this will all play out?

This is just some food for thought as we watch how these trends develop.

We’ll be keeping a close eye on things. Enjoy the rest of your weekend. 

Sources:

1. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/26/ai-data-center-frenzy-is-pushing-up-your-electric-bill-heres-why.html
2. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/03/families-could-get-see-higher-electric-bills-if-ai-data-boom-goes-bust.html
3. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-12-01/china-s-private-data-on-home-sales-vanishes-after-vanke-turmoil
4. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/china-vanke-bonds-fall-after-report-one-year-debt-extension-plan-2025-12-02/
5. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/21/japans-cabinet-announces-135-billion-stimulus-package-nhk.html

Disclosures:

This communication is general in nature and provided for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be considered or relied upon as legal, tax or investment advice or an investment recommendation, or as a substitute for legal or tax counsel. Any investment products or services named herein are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be considered an offer to buy or sell, or an investment recommendation for, any specific security, strategy or investment product or service. Always consult a qualified professional or your own independent financial professional for personalized advice or investment recommendations tailored to your specific goals, individual situation, and risk tolerance. 

Information contained in the materials included is believed to be from reliable sources, but no representations or guarantees are made as to the accuracy or completeness of information.

Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc. is a Registered Investment Adviser and Broker/Dealer. Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services and securities offered through Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc.