Content Editor, Dunham | 2025 ThinkAdvisor Luminary Award Winner | 2026 Wealthies Finalist — Thought Leader of the Year | Macroeconomics, markets, geopolitics & global trends
Originally published November 2023 | Updated March 2026:China's economy is showing classic signs of a balance sheet recession: combined debt near 308% of GDP, a prolonged property downturn, and households saving more while borrowing less, even as interest rates fall. The risk, as economist Richard Koo's framework suggests, is that rate cuts fail to revive growth once the private sector shifts its focus from spending to repairing damaged balance sheets, a pattern that trapped Japan in stagnation for decades.
Key Takeaways:
China’s economy is flashing red: debt is rising, deflation is taking hold, consumer demand is weak, and property prices continue to fall.
Households and businesses are deleveraging—focusing on debt repayment instead of spending or investing.
Rate cuts may backfire, as savers earn less, banks struggle with razor-thin margins, and credit demand stalls.
Chinese banks are under mounting stress, with net interest margins at record lows and non-performing loans on the rise.
An aging population and limited social safety nets are fueling high precautionary savings and lower consumption.
Bottom line: China risks following Japan into a prolonged period of low growth, stagnation, and deflation—a classic balance sheet recession scenario.
Is China Facing a Balance Sheet Recession?
China’s economy - the second-largest in the world - is showing some serious economic issues. From surging debt and record-low bank margins to disappearing consumer confidence, signs are pointing toward something deeper: a balance sheet recession.
This is a rare and damaging economic condition that Japan fell into in the 1990s - and the West after 2008.
Now, all signs suggest China may be next. And if so, traditional stimulus measures like interest rate cuts may not just fail - they may backfire.
Let’s unpack what’s happening.
What Is A Balance Sheet Recession?
Put simply, a balance sheet recession refers to an economic situation in which the main problem affecting an economy is the excessive debt burden of households, businesses, or both.
It’s a concept popularized by the economist – Richard Koo – and particularly focuses on the context of the economic challenges faced by countries stuck in deleveraging (repaying debt) and thus anemic credit demand.
Typically, these balance sheets are burdened with high levels of debt, often resulting from a speculative bubble in real estate or other assets that have burst, and consumers shy away from credit.
And during a balance sheet recession, the primary concern of households and businesses is to repair their damaged balance sheets by paying down debt rather than spending or investing.
This results in reduced consumption, decreased business investment, and a lack of overall demand in the economy. Consequently, economic growth becomes sluggish or negative, and unemployment may rise.
Sound familiar?
Now, monetary policy – which often involves lowering interest rates to stimulate borrowing and spending – is becoming less effective in this situation because the focus is on reducing debt rather than taking on new loans.
This means if individuals are deleveraging (paying down debt) and avoiding new loans, rate cuts are meaningless.
“But isn’t paying down debt a good thing?”
Yes. In general, it is.
The problem here is when everyone does it at once.
This is known as the fallacy of composition – aka the error of assuming that what is true of a member of a group is true for the group as a whole.
So as individuals consume less to repay debts, the savings rate increases.
And when individuals and businesses save more and spend less, it reduces aggregate demand in the economy, leading to decreased consumption and investment. This, in turn, can contribute to a prolonged period of sluggish economic activity, deflation, and low growth rates.
Meanwhile, low demand for new loans causes interest rates to sink lower (if there are more savings than new loans, rates will decline until an equilibrium is found). Making it more difficult for central bankers to stimulate growth.
And on and on.
Thus because of this backdrop, China’s interest rate cuts will most likely only aggravate this dilemma.
Here’s why. . .
China Is Teetering Into A Balance Sheet Recession – And Rate Cuts May Make It Worse
In economic and monetary theory, when growth is sluggish, cutting interest rates should spur demand.
The idea is that ‘rational’ actors will take advantage of lower interest rates to further consume and invest.
But in the real world, it doesn’t work like that in many instances (just look at Japan and Europe).
In fact, cutting interest rates will likely make the imbalances worse.
There are two big reasons for this:
First - China has an excessively2 high gross domestic savings rate to GDP (gross domestic product) at 46% as of 2022 – meaning that the Chinese save far more than they spend.
Figure 1: TradingEconomics, 2023
To put this into perspective, the U.S.’s domestic savings rate as a share of GDP is only 17.5%.
So, why is China’s saving rate so high?
That’s because Beijing focuses on infrastructure, manufacturing, exports, and SOEs (state-owned enterprises) – thus consumer demand remains repressed so that there’s an ample pool of savings to fuel investment.
Long story short, reducing consumption inherently increases savings (can’t do two things with the same dollar, right?)
While this worked when China was grossly under-invested in the early 2000s, they’ve now hit the law of diminishing returns. Meaning that much of the investment is unprofitable and wasteful.
China’s macro-leverage ratio – which hit an all-time high3 in Q2-2023 of 291% – indicates this.
To put this into perspective, if economic growth and returns were increasing in tandem, the ratio of debt to GDP wouldn’t also be rising.
This shows us that China’s economy is unbalanced and must instead focus on its domestic economy.
But so far, China has only stimulated further supply-side (exports and infrastructure). Making the problems worse.
Secone - Chinese banks (already under stress) have seen their net interest margins (NIMs) sink to very low levels.
According to Bloomberg4, Chinese banks’ NIMs (net interest margins) have declined to just 1.74% as of Q1-2023.
Figure 2: Bloomberg, 2023
And things appear to be getting worse
According to S&P Global5, “China's megabanks expect net interest margins (NIMs) to fall further in the second half of 2023 as weakness in the world's second-biggest economy may prompt further policy easing… All of the so-called big four lenders — Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp., Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. and Bank of China Ltd. — reported declines in their NIMs for the first six months of 2023, attributing this to a fall in lending rates due to policy easing, while deposit rates stayed relatively sticky…”
This is important because NIMs are how banks make a profit (it’s the difference between loan incomes and the costs to lend).
Chinese banks have already seen increasing non-performing loans (NPLs) – hitting a record 3 trillion yuan in June 2022. And Moody’s6 expects this to only increase over the next one-to-two years.
“New NPL formation will likely remain high amid the challenging adjustment to the exit from zero-COVID,” the report said. “We expect banks to steadily dispose of bad debt over the next 12-18 months to keep the NPL ratio stable at the current level of 1.63%.”
So, in theory, lower deposit rates (when the PBOC – China’s Central Bank - cuts rates) should help bank NIMs.
But in an environment with rising toxic debt, unprofitable investment, and weak lending - it may make things worse.
The bigger issue here is that because of the high gross savings – lower deposit rates will generate less returns for savers. Thus, weighing down their spending further (as we saw in Japan and Germany) as they must save more to make up for the declining interest income.
China's Consumer Situation - From Bad to Worse?
Chinese consumers are already dealing with weak confidence. And although it rebounded after reopening, it’s still very low.
Figure 3: TradingEconomics, 2023
This anemic consumer confidence, combined with lower returns on savings, may tip households into further hoarding. Meaning they shy away from new credit and spending.
And this is what we’ve seen. . .
China’s household debt-to-GDP is already relatively elevated at 63% as of Q1-2023. But it’s been essentially flat for three years straight (after more than doubling over the previous decade).
Figure 4: CEIC data. 2023
It appears that the appetite for credit among consumers has declined as property prices began falling – leading to more saving and deleveraging.
And this is where the balance sheet recession comes in…
Roughly 70% of Chinese household wealth is tied7 to property prices.
Thus, as Chinese property prices keep declining, this is negatively affecting household balance sheets.
Figure 5: Bloomberg, 2023
Or – put another way – they’re suffering fixed debt burdens (such as mortgages) that are tied to a sinking asset (property prices). A dangerous combination.
It’s also important to note that China lacks the social safety nets that places like the U.S. have - meaning they have weak social security programs, no 30-year fixed mortgages, etc.
Thus, individuals must save more (consume less) to prepare for retirement and healthcare costs later in life.
And since there’s a surging8 number of Chinese retiring in the coming decades, this savings trend looks to only increase.
FIgure 6: The Conversation, 2023
Beijing's Conundrum: Stuck Between a Rock and a Hard Place
With this backdrop in mind – an aging population paired with risk aversion – cutting interest rates may prove useless. And instead, make things worse.
This is very similar to what happened in Japan. Leaving the Bank of Japan pushing on a string.
Thus, China must find a way to do two things – revive consumer confidence and stimulate domestic demand.
But things look to be going in the opposite direction.
For instance, the dollar-to-yuan conversion has increased by 8% since January 11th. Meaning that the yuan has depreciated significantly because China is cutting interest rates while the U.S. raised them (putting pressure in the yuan).
Figure 7: Bloomberg, 2023
Remember, a weakening currency is essentially a tax on the Chinese consumer as it raises the costs of imports.
China’s exports to GDP are already around ~17.1% (as of 2022) - meaning they are offloading a large amount of unconsumed goods abroad.
If China wanted to promote greater domestic demand, it must allow the yuan to rise, run deficits, restructure bad debts, and stimulate wage growth. Essentially policies that promote domestic consumption compared to exports.
But with such structural imbalances, it would prove extremely difficult politically and cause economic pain in the short term. Neither things Beijing wants to deal with nor have they indicated they'll do.
Thus, the risk here is that the longer this current situation goes on, the more entrenched a balance sheet recession becomes (as we learned from Japan).
Things look very fragile in China. And a balance sheet recession looks likely.
As the second-largest economy in the world, this is something that may echo loudly.
Just some food for thought.
Frequently Asked Questions About China's Balance Sheet Recession Risk
What is a balance sheet recession? A balance sheet recession happens when households and businesses focus on paying down debt instead of spending or investing, usually after an asset bubble bursts. Economist Richard Koo coined the term to describe this pattern. Growth stalls because the private sector is repairing balance sheets rather than borrowing, even when central banks cut rates to spur new lending.
Why is China at risk of a balance sheet recession? China's combined government, corporate, and household debt has climbed to roughly 308% of GDP, and a long property downturn keeps eating into household wealth since most Chinese family wealth sits in real estate. Consumers are saving more and borrowing less, and household debt-to-GDP has actually dropped in recent quarters as families put debt repayment ahead of new spending.
How could rate cuts make China's situation worse? Rate cuts usually spur borrowing, but that effect fades when households are already focused on paying down debt instead of taking out new loans. China's high savings rate adds another wrinkle. Lower rates cut into interest income for savers, which can push them to save even more to cover the loss, reinforcing the same cautious behavior policymakers want to reverse.
What are the long-term risks if China doesn't resolve this? If deleveraging and weak consumer demand drag on, China risks following the path Japan took in the 1990s into a long stretch of low growth, deflation, and financial stress. China also faces a fast-aging population and a thinner social safety net than Japan had, which could deepen precautionary saving and make the adjustment even harder to unwind.
What can China do to avoid a Japan-style balance sheet recession? China would need to move its economy toward domestic consumption instead of leaning on exports and infrastructure investment, build up its social safety net so households feel less pressure to over-save, and clean up bad debt weighing on banks and property developers. So far, policy has leaned more on supply-side stimulus, which risks feeding the same imbalances rather than fixing them.
This communication is general in nature and provided for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be considered or relied upon as legal, tax, or investment advice or an investment recommendation, or as a substitute for legal counsel. Any investment products or services named herein are for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered an offer to buy or sell, or an investment recommendation for, any specific security, strategy, or investment product or service. Always consult a qualified professional or your own independent financial professional for personalized advice or investment recommendations tailored to your specific goals, individual situation, and risk tolerance.
Information contained in the materials included is believed to be from reliable sources, but no representations or guarantees are made as to the accuracy or completeness of information. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice
Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc. is a Registered Investment Adviser and Broker/Dealer. Member FINRA / SIPC. Advisory services and securities offered through Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc.
